Monday, 5 October 2009

News from the EUSSR

Heard the news? No, I am not talking about Sir Alex complaining to a referee or Ken Livingstone whingeing about Boris Johnson appearing on Eastenders, what I am talking about instead is the Irish voters handing their sovereignty to the EU.

Only last year, if you recall, the Irish had casted their vote about the European Constitution. But last time the No had won, so the European Parliament has allegedly changed parts of the European Constitution (Really? How? Can anybody give me a clear example?), threw money to Ireland (i.e. bribed their government) and, voila, Irish voters have been asked again to cast their vote.

This time, however, the Yes has won and no more referendum is now needed. In fact, in true European Union style, once the only acceptable answer is given (Yes, of course), the game is done and politicians of the main parties (Left or Right, whatever) rush to congratulate themselves to the next target: convincing the renegade states, Czech Republic and Poland, to sign the bloody Lisbon treaty.

The media, in the meantime, are quick to glorify the great achievement of the European Union and the Irish voters have been immediately re-instated to the status of human thinking beings, and the same happened with the US voters after they voted for Obama in the last presidential election.

It is undeniable that every time some European country, naughty enough to hold a referendum in the first place (where are you Mr Brown? Mr Berlusconi?), decides not to give away their sovereignty to the EU super-state, the media and the establishment are utterly disgusted. All of a sudden the pro-Europe intelligentsia, usually so much “for the people”, is raising the issue that maybe the people are not clever enough to vote, or maybe the questions were not asked in the proper way because, in their Soviet-like minds, there could not possibly be so many people not agreeing that the European Union can only be a successful idea.

Euro-sceptics, in fact, are usually portrayed as a mixture of fascists, close minded, Neanderthal, underdeveloped morons who must be silenced in order for the future of Europe to be possible.

The European Union is getting more and more executive powers without our consent, but why Brussels should decide how to rule the UK or Italy or Ireland? What is the point of having fought World War II if the sovereignty of our states is given away to a utopian un-represented bunch of bureaucrats?

Behind our back more laws are introduced and political correctness is the weapon of the new dictatorship that is taking over Europe while we waste our time thinking about the new football season or X Factor wannabe singers.

The EU is getting bigger, just like the Soviet Union or the Third Reich did. The first two empires used tanks, while the EU uses the media, diplomatic bullying and lack of information to allow the empire to expand. Can anyone, sane of mind out there, explain to me why, when a referendum about Europe is finally taking place, and if the answer is not what the EU wants, the referendum is taken again and again, until the outcome satisfies Brussels? Do we call this democracy? I call it scam.

The issue about Europe is a big one and a serious one. Please note the following:

The word empire, referred to the European Union is not mine. I have actually quoted from Jose Manual Barroso, yes, the President of the European Commission. You can check him out in the following interview:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c2Ralocq9uE

The link between the Soviet Union and the European Union is not mine invention either. It has been expressed by a former Soviet dissident and free-thinker, Boris Bukovsky. You can read his opinion in the following link:
http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/865

Or watch his interview on YouTube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4YEjgg5cuwE

4 comments:

Kevin said...

Well, I think we should bring back "Jeux Sans Fronitieres" as a reality TV show - it was all good fun, no-one got hurt or had their pride injured, no-one got famous and money did not come into the equation. And the best of it was that all the competitors from the different European countries got to dress up as a duck or something silly.

The following abbreviated lines of a Victorian poem were quoted by Winston Churchill in response to the then government's lack of resolve in dealing with re-armament over on the Continent. The "clattering train" is of course, the "Bwitish" Government. There are no prizes for guessing who the driver was.
---------------------
Who is in charge of the clattering train?
The axles creak and the couplings strain,
and the pace is hot and the points are near,
and sleep hath deadened the driver's ear,
and the signals flash through the night in vain,
for death is in charge of the clattering train
-------------
But then again, it should be pointed out that it was Churchill himself who advocated the creation of the European family of nations :)

... and that Jeux sans Frontieres was an idea of Charles de Gaulle. Neither leader was a Communist. Incidentally, each nation called the games by this name according to their own language. This reflected not only their cultural inclination towards the friendly, communal spirit of the games but also their attitude toward their neighbours. Hence in Germany it was: Spiele Ohne Grenzen, Spain: Juegos sin fronteras, Italy: Giochi senza frontiere, Netherlands: Spel zonder grenzen etc,... that is except for Britain who called it: "It's a Knock Out" - perhaps one should wonder why?

Valerio said...

Games are fun stuff. Losing identity is something very serious. In one of the links Mr Bukovsky referred to confidential documents from secret Soviet files which he was allowed to read in 1992. These documents confirm the existence of a “conspiracy” to turn the European Union into a socialist organization.
I am not against Europe (I am Italian in fact) but I am against an unelected political body to rule above my own country or any country. Europe is a geographical term not a political one.

Anonymous said...

[url=http://www.onlinecasinos.gd]casino[/url], also known as principal casinos or Internet casinos, are online versions of uncommon ("cobber and mortar") casinos. Online casinos distribute gamblers to extemporize and wager on casino games from start to waste the Internet.
Online casinos superficially instruction odds and payback percentages that are comparable to land-based casinos. Some online casinos law higher payback percentages during duck chart games, and some impel known payout degree audits on their websites. Assuming that the online casino is using an fittingly programmed unspecific condense up generator, catalogue games like blackjack clothed an established congress edge. The payout component during these games are established at unpremeditated the rules of the game.
Assorted online casinos tuck into societal upon or bow their software from companies like Microgaming, Realtime Gaming, Playtech, Supranational Alternate way Technology and CryptoLogic Inc.

Anonymous said...

top [url=http://www.c-online-casino.co.uk/]uk casinos[/url] brake the latest [url=http://www.realcazinoz.com/]online casino[/url] autonomous no store hand-out at the chief [url=http://www.baywatchcasino.com/]online casino
[/url].